Legal Opinion

Flynn and Miller v. State Fund And

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2008No. DA 06-0734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellants Montana State Fund, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp., and certain “Common Fund Insurers” (collectively State Fund) appeal from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the WCC err by refusing to apply judicial decisions retroactively to only claims in “active” litigation?

¶4 2. Did the WCC err in its final definition of a “settled” claim?

¶5 3. Did the WCC err when it concluded that the terms “closed” and “inactive” were not included in our Schmill II directive?

¶6 4. Did the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API