Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Montana State Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2011No. DA 10-0368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Petitioners Robert Flynn and Carl Miller (collectively 'Flynn”) appeal the Order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) defining the term “paid in full,” as used in the definition of “settled” workers’ compensation claims, for purposes of determining the retroactive application of judicial decisions. On appeal, we consider whether the WCC properly applied retroactivity principles in formulating a definition of “paid in full.”

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 We begin by summarizing the protracted history of this matter. This opinion marks the Court’s third decision since 2002,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Taylor v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Department of Health & Environmental Sciences v. LasorteMontana Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API