Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hummer v. Betenbough

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1965No. 7457Published

1DissentNoble, Justice

I agree that even without the Betenbough brothers’ disclaimer and waiver of the right to inherit from their sister, the residuary-clause of the will is invalid because of the undue influence exerted by them on their sister. But, I am convinced that there is no evidence in this case from which it can be said that such undue influence extended to the gift of the home to testatrix’ sister.

The basis of the influence exerted by the brothers is clearly stated in a former decision by this court involving all of the property owned by the testatrix, except the home given to Isa McClish. In Hughes v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EikerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Hyatt v. WrotenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. McElhinney v. KellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Wombacher v. BarthelmeIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McCarthy v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API