Legal Opinion

McElhinney v. Kelly

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1960No. 6582PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

Contestant appeals from a judgment in an original proceeding in the district court admitting a will to probate. Three questions are presented. (1) Was the will attested as required by statute, (2) is there substantial evidence to support a finding of testamentary capacity, and (3) should probate of the will be denied because of undue influence.

George F. McElhinney, the testator, was a man 72 years of age who, at the time of execution of the will offered for probate, was a patient at the Veteran’s Hospital in Albuquerque suffering from lung cancer of which he died January 17,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wiley v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re Mitchell's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Heirs of Blanchard v. Heirs of BlanchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  4. In Re Bryan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Calloway v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Matter of FerrillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Roybal v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hummer v. BetenboughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Montoya v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API