Legal Opinion

People v. Ernst

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1975No. Crim. 25477PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Defendants Ernst, Williams, and Bodady were charged by information with a violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11355. After they were held to answer, the superior court granted their motions to set aside the information. The People appeal.

Facts

One Robert Hodge was working as a special employee for the Federal Narcotics Task Force. On September 27, 1973, Hodge, who had known Ernst socially before that time, told Ernst that he “had a market for cocaine” and asked Ernst if he knew anyone who could obtain cocaine. Ernst said that he did know people who could supply…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CamodecaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. AdamiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. ShephardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. McDanielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API