Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 24, 1990No. 88-1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are not disputed. The defendant, Robert Eric Freeman, agreed to sell a controlled substance, cocaine, to Keith Hatcher. Unfortunately for Freeman, Hatcher was cooperating with the government. Hatcher gave Freeman $200, and Freeman gave Hatcher approximately two grams of what was supposed to be cocaine. To everyone’s surprise, the “cocaine” turned out to be acetaminophen. Acetaminophen is not a controlled substance.

Freeman was convicted at a bench trial of delivering a simulated controlled substance with respect to a substance represented to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. State v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. People v. ErnstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BabersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. In re H.E.W., Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1995
  4. In the Matter of HewCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995
  5. State of Iowa v. Jason Levant FergusonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API