Ehlenfield v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The sole question presented on appeal is whether Sgt. Granic, a New York State Trooper, was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the vehicular accident in which claimant Robert Ehlenfield sustained serious personal injuries. The trial court determined, as a matter of law, that he was not, and dismissed claimants’ action upon the close of their case. In order to conclude that an employee is acting within the scope of his employment, it must be found that he is doing something in furtherance of the duties he owes to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Sauter v. New York Tribune, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Johnson v. Daily News, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rappaport v. International Playtex Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stavitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Medina v. FullerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Overton v. EbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Patterson v. Southeastern Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Dinkins v. FarleyNew York Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.