Legal Opinion
Dinkins v. Farley
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David 0. Boehm, J.
This case presents a question of apparent first impression. Neither the citations furnished by counsel nor the court’s own research of the case law in this State and outside of the State have furnished any available precedent within the peculiar factual pattern of this case.
The facts are not complex. This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff resulting from an accident involving an automobile owned by defendant, Violet C. Farley, and operated by defendant, Victor F. Farley. The plaintiff has also sued defendant, Xerox Corporation,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Makoske v. LombardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Ehlenfield v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. v. DunnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- McBride v. County of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Henderson v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Cambridge v. Telemarketing Concepts, Inc.Yonkers City Court · 1997
- Kerns v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008