Legal Opinion

Pittsburg & Midway Coal Co. v. Laning Harris Coal Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Thos. J. Seehorn, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

This is an action for conversion in which the ¡judgment was for the plaintiff in the trial court.

Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in mining and .shipping coal to market from Pittsburg, Kansas. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the coal business, including the sale of coal on commission and remittance of proceeds to those engaging its services. It had business connection with plaintiff and had served plaintiff in the manner indicated for several years. Defendant’s shipping and billing clerk was one Hiatt. He likewise sometimes bought and sold coal for plaintiff, but he had no authority…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Porges v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Koch v. Branch & CrookesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. Kenneth Investment Co. v. National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixie Guano Co. v. WesselCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API