Legal Opinion

Dixie Guano Co. v. Wessel

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1924No. 2150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Circuit Judge.

The defendants in error, plaintiffs in the District Court, instituted their suit at law against the plaintiff in error, defendant below (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendant), to recover $4,964.40, the value of 110,320 net pounds of nitrate, alleged to have been feloniously stolen from the plaintiffs by W. B. Tredwell, and wrongfully sold and delivered by him to the defendant, and by it converted to its own use, without the knowledge and consent of the plaintiffs, who never parted with their title to said nitrates, and have never been paid therefor.

Plainti…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Capitol Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  4. Dana v. National Bank of the RepublicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Bank of Overton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. QueenanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  2. Schneider v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Alford v. Barnett National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. In Re Mifflin Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Sheridan v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API