Legal Opinion

State v. Pham

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 1, 2000No. 82,596PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beier, J.:

Charles D. Pham originally raised seven issues in this direct appeal from his conviction for aggravated assault We reverse and remand for a new trial.

We need to address only five of Pham’s issues to give the district court adequate guidance on remand. Those five ask; (1) Did the district court err in allowing testimony on gang membership to be introduced at trial? (2) Did the district court err in allowing the prosecution to question witnesses about the gun seized at the time of arrest? (3) Did the prosecutor engage in misconduct during closing argument? (4) Did the district court’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. LumleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. State v. JamisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. LumbreraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. BarfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WinstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. HazleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API