Legal Opinion

State v. Hazley

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 2, 2001No. 84,538PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beier, J.:

Defendant-appellant Emeline Hazley brings this direct appeal after her jury convictions for possession of methamphetamine and marijuana. She argues five issues: (1) The prosecutor improperly questioned a State witness regarding post- Miranda silence; (2) the prosecutor made improper comments during closing argument; (3) the trial court erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction; (4) the trial court erred in failing to give an instruction on nonexclusive possession of premises and the definition of “possession” as used in the charges; and (5) the evidence at trial was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. DeaversSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. State v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API