State v. Hazley
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beier, J.:
Defendant-appellant Emeline Hazley brings this direct appeal after her jury convictions for possession of methamphetamine and marijuana. She argues five issues: (1) The prosecutor improperly questioned a State witness regarding post- Miranda silence; (2) the prosecutor made improper comments during closing argument; (3) the trial court erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction; (4) the trial court erred in failing to give an instruction on nonexclusive possession of premises and the definition of “possession” as used in the charges; and (5) the evidence at trial was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. DeaversSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.