Farming, Inc. v. John E. Manning, Collector of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a suit to recover certain Social Security and unemployment taxes paid by the defendant to the Collector of Internal Revenue. 1 There is only one question in the case. If the work which certain employees did for the plaintiff consisted of “agricultural labor,” the plaintiff is entitled to have his money back because agricultural labor is exempt from the coverage of the statutes involved. The district court found these employees not within the exemption and entered judgment for the defendant. D.C.N.J.1954, 121 F.Supp. 252.
The facts are simple and were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Latimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- Lake Region Packing Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Farming, Inc. v. ManningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Batt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Consulting Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Mid-Continent Aerial Sprayers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Felix MarreroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Felix MarreroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982