Legal Opinion

Latimer v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 25, 1943No. 2518-RJ, 2519-PH, 2520-O'C, 2521-PH, 2522-YPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, District Judge.

The above entitled five actions have been consolidated. They involve similar issues. Each cause is brought for the recovery of Social Security taxes which were paid by respective plaintiffs to the Government between the years 1936 and 1939. The separate status and activities of each plaintiff are hereinafter substantially stated. Generally, the taxes were imposed and the collections made under the Social Security Act of August 14, 1935, 49 Stat. 620, 42 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., and, specifically, the exactions here involved pertain to Title VIII of the Act, 42…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Jones v. Gaylord Guernsey FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Stuart v. KleckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. California Employment Commission v. KovacevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Miller v. BurgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Burger v. Social Security BoardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
  5. Lake Region Packing Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API