Legal Opinion

Julie Beiler Zook v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 20, 2013No. 9773-12LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2013-128

UNITED STATES TAX COURT JULIE BEILER ZOOK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9773-12L. Filed May 20, 2013. Julie Beiler Zook, pro se. Kristina L. Rico, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION RUWE, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent’s motion for summary judgment (motion) pursuant to Rule 121.1 Respondent contends that no 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (continued...) -2- [*2] genuine dispute exists…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API