RA Hanson Co., Inc. v. Magnuson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, P.S. (Witherspoon Kelley) appeal from the trial court’s order finding it in contempt for refusing to provide the information requested by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. (RAHCO). Witherspoon Kelley argues the information is protected by the attorney-client privilege. University City, Inc., asks this court to accept discretionary review of the trial court’s denial of its summary judgment motion. We affirm the contempt order, finding the information is not protected by the attorney-client privilege. We find no obvious error by the trial court and decline to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Lynott v. National Union Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Seventh Elect Church v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dietz v. DoeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.