Tubular Rivet & Stud Co. v. O'Brien
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity.'
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
The bill makes the following allegations: The complainant is the owner of certain patents for setting lacing studs, which patents are embodied in machines made by it. These machines it does not sell, but licenses their use by a lease which provides that the licensees shall use in the machines only those studs which are manufactured by the complainant, and that, upon violation of any of the conditions of the lease, the right td the further use of the machine by the licensees is forfeited, and the complainant may retake possession thereof. The respondent áélls) and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Wallace v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1871
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Beach v. HobbsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. ErrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Rupp & Wittgenfeld Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.