Legal Opinion
State v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1945No. Nos. 33,941, 33,942, 33,945, 33,946PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
We have cross-appeals in two cases, both tried together below and consolidated here. The vital issue common to both cases is whether L. 1943, c. 620, is a constitutionally valid enactment.
We shall first consider the issues presented in State v. Northwestern National Bank. There the state, by action for a declaratory judgment, sought to have the cited act determined to be a valid enactment; that defendant is subject to all its provisions; that the state “is entitled to establish and enforce its rights in and to the funds and other property” described in its complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- First National Bank of San Jose v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Germantown Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Board of Trustees of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Landreth v. First National Bank of Cleburne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.