Legal Opinion

State v. Bornhoeft

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. 20090067PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Faron Bornhoeft appeals a district court order denying his motion to dismiss the charge of disorderly conduct as reserved in his conditional guilty plea under Rule 11(a)(2) of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.

I

[If 2] On November 1, 2008, at 12:27 a.m., a McLean County deputy sheriff found the defendant’s wife walking through the Underwood anhydrous plant. She told him she had been at a bar with Bornhoeft and was trying to cool off because they had been arguing. The deputy offered to talk to Bornhoeft, but his wife “begged” him not to.

[¶ 3] The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. JelliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of Bismarck v. SchoppertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Cruff v. A.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AlbarelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. State v. DeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hoggarth v. KroppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API