Legal Opinion

Herm v. Stafford

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 15, 1978No. 6651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BALLANTINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on motion of defendant, Carling Dinkier, for summary judgment based on the Statute of Limitations under Kentucky Revised Statutes 292.480(3). July 10, 1970, was the latest date which gave plaintiffs notice of the alleged fraud for purposes of the commencing of the applicable limitation period. The original complaint in this action was filed on June 23, 1970, with an amended complaint filed on October 15, 1970. Not until October 20, 1972, was Dinkier named as a defendant in the second amended complaint.

The complaint…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andujar v. RogowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Dr. Frank B. McMahon v. Meredith Corporation, and Dr. Charles G. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Erickson v. Wright Welding Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Paskuly v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. Herm v. StaffordDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API