Legal Opinion

Coram v. Ingersoll

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 16, 1906No. 610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Aldrich, District Judge, dissenting. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

LOAVELL, Circuit Judge.

Andrew J. Davis died a citizen of Montana, leaving property both in Montana and in Massachusetts. John A. Davis, one of his next of kin, offered for probate in Montana a will which gave to him nearly the whole of this property. Certain other next of kin, desiring to contest the will, retained as counsel Robert G. Ingersoll, a citizen of New York, the plaintiff's intestate. Shortly afterwards two of these clients agreed with him in writing for his employment, and for a fee of $100,000 conditioned upon the defeat of the will.

The validity of the will was tried in Montana,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Stacy v. Thrasher Ex Rel. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  5. United States v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. KeownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1919
  2. Cornue v. IngersollCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API