Legal Opinion
Moritz v. Luzerne County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1925No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appellant sued the County of Luzerne to recover salary alleged to be due him as court interpreter in accordance with the Act of May 6, 1915, P. L. 271, less credits for per diem payments which he admitted had been made for all days of actual service rendered by him. The case was tried by the court below, without a jury, under the Act of April 22,1874, P. L. 109. Judgment was entered for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
The Act of May 8, 1913, P. L. 170, provides that “the court of common pleas of each county is authorized to employ such number of interpreters......as the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Commonwealth ex rel. Bowman v. SliferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Jones v. DusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- County of Luzerne v. TrimmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ShawellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shoemaker v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hanover Township School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- In re Appointment of a School Director for Region No. 9 of the Keystone Central School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hamill Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1977