Legal Opinion

Hanover Township School Directors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1927No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

Three sets of school directors figure in this case: (1) a board elected by the people and removed by the court below for dereliction in office, as hereinafter more particularly stated; (2) a board named by Judge McLean of the court below to fill the unexpired terms of the ousted directors; and (3) a board named, or purporting to have been named, by the court below in banc.

The case comes before us on an appeal by the second of the above boards. May 10, 1927, we granted a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be made a supersedeas, and directed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McCormick's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Carney v. Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Murray's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Moritz v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShawellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. First Congressional District ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. BonserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. BurchardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API