Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. Shoemaker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1942No. 35,554PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage. The facts are undisputed. The Federal Land Bank of Wichita, as plaintiff, brought this action to foreclose its first mortgage. The mortgagors, Luther H. Shoemaker and Cora M. Shoemaker, his wife, the appellant, Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation, second mortgagee, and the present owners of the property, Ray C. Sloan and Marie Sloan, *502his wife, were named as parties defendant. All of the defendants except the appellant defaulted in the case. The appellant filed an answer to the plaintiff’s petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Lauriat v. StrattonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1880
  3. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. ButzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. PastineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  3. Federal Land Bank v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Fidelity Bank v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Federal Land Bank v. LudwigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API