Legal Opinion

Fidelity Bank v. King

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 26, 2005No. 92,410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

This case involves sale proceeds remaining after a sheriff s sale and payment of a first mortgage judgment. U.S. Bank, N.A., (U.S. Bank) appeals the district court’s decision to distribute the remaining proceeds to River City Enterprises, L.L.C., (River City) after payment of Fidelity Bank’s first mortgage. U.S. Bank argues it should have received the proceeds as second mortgage holder instead of River City as holder of the owner’s right of redemption. We affirm.

The facts of this case are undisputed. In 1997, James and Carolyn King assumed the debt and obligations for real estate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Nicholas v. NicholasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Price v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Cowan v. StokerUtah Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. In Re RuckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API