Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Remington Arms Co.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided December 19, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-4182-KESPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Carol O’Neal, as personal representative of the estate of Lanny O’Neal, deceased, brought an action against defendants, Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, alleging strict liability (product defect), strict liability (failure to warn), negligent design and manufacture, negligent failure to warn, and spoliation of evidence. Plaintiffs spoliation of evidence claim was dismissed following a motion by defendants. Defendants now move for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindholm v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API