Davis v. Akridge
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Presiding Justice.
1. It is a well-recognized principle of law, which is not controverted in this case, that a deed absolute in form may be shown to have been made to secure a debt, provided possession of the property involved remains in the maker. Mercer v. Morgan, 136 Ga. 632 (71 S. E. 1075); Askew v. Thompson, 129 Ga. 329 (2) (58 S. E. 854) ; Spencer v. Schuman, 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 466); B ashinski v. Swint, 133 Ga. 38 (2) (65 S. E. 152); Simpson v. Ray, 180 Ga. 395 (2) (178 S. E. 726) ; Powell on Actions for Land, § 388. This is true for the reason that under the Code, § 85-408,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McDonald v. DabneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Ray v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Douglas v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.