Legal Opinion

Davis v. Akridge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1945No. 15315PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

1. It is a well-recognized principle of law, which is not controverted in this case, that a deed absolute in form may be shown to have been made to secure a debt, provided possession of the property involved remains in the maker. Mercer v. Morgan, 136 Ga. 632 (71 S. E. 1075); Askew v. Thompson, 129 Ga. 329 (2) (58 S. E. 854) ; Spencer v. Schuman, 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 466); B ashinski v. Swint, 133 Ga. 38 (2) (65 S. E. 152); Simpson v. Ray, 180 Ga. 395 (2) (178 S. E. 726) ; Powell on Actions for Land, § 388. This is true for the reason that under the Code, § 85-408,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. McDonald v. DabneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Ray v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Douglas v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API