Legal Opinion

White v. McNab

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The designating petition contained 1,925 signatures; 1,349 were required to validate. The deletion of 468 signatures at Special Term is not challenged on appeal. We conclude that another 45 must be stricken for error on the part of a subscribing witness with respect to his election district (cf. Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993). From the record supplemented by representations on oral argument we have also concluded that an additional 200 signatures must be eliminated because of undated and uninitialed alterations in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutter v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Matter of Goodman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Marcatante v. LundyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berger v. AcitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Berger v. AcitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. De Bruin v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Flanagan v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Dos Anjos v. CarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API