Legal Opinion

De Bruin v. McGee

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*910The record discloses that there were 1,617 signatures on the designating petition; 1,500 were required under the statute. It was stipulated at Special Term that 77 signatures were invalid. We conclude that another 150 signatures must be invalidated for omission or error with respect to the election district of subscribing witnesses (cf. Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993). There accordingly were insufficient signatures to validate the petition. We neither reach nor consider the other issues tendered (see Matter of White v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rutter v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. White v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. CarlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Berger v. AcitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. McLiverty v. LefeverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Sinagra v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Allen v. First Presbyterian Church of IronwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API