Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Schwartz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The record discloses that there were 1,617 signatures on the designating petition; 1,500 were required under the statute. It was stipulated at Special Term that 75 signatures were invalid. We conclude that another 134 signatures must be invalidated for omission or error with respect to the election or assembly district of subscribing witnesses (Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; cf. Matter of Berry v Dodd, 38 NY2d 995). There accordingly were insufficient signatures to validate the petition. We neither reach nor consider…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutter v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Berry v. DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. White v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. CarlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Berger v. AcitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Berger v. AcitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. Bayne v. SachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Higby v. MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API