Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo & Co. v. Mayor of Jersey City

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 5, 1913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

At Law. Action by Wells Fargo & Co. against the Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City.

1Opinion of the Court

RELLSTAB, District Judge.

In an action to recover damages for property injured in consequence-of mobs and riots, the case was submitted to the jtiry under special instructions. The jury found, in answer to the questions submitted, that the plaintiff had been damaged $300 in its tangible property and $43,000 in its intangible property— *873its business. This business was collecting, transporting, and delivering merchandise, a general intrastate and interstate express business. In conducting that part of its business involved in this suit, the plaintiff used a pier on the Jersey City side of 1 lie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. City of Chicago v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Chidsey v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. EbelMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. ArenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API