Legal Opinion

Goldring v. Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1983No. 2-82-121-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs below (the Goldrings) appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of Texas Commerce Bank — Arlington (“the Bank”), formerly Arlington Bank & Trust, in their suit to recover statutory penalties for usury under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 5069-1.06. They alleged that the Bank demanded and received attorneys’ fees, and interest thereon, in excess of the amount specified in their note, as a condition to extending the note and withdrawing the Bank’s posted foreclosure on their property and that this constituted “interest” that rendered the note…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shook v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington v. GoldringTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington v. GoldringTexas Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API