People v. Lujano
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
This case raises important questions about how police should react when they encounter someone in front of a house engaged in suspicious activity. Here, police officers contacted and detained not only an individual in the driveway in front of a house, whom they observed stripping copper wire from an air conditioner, but also the occupant of the house, suspecting that “maybe possibly” a burglary was in progress. The officers were aware of no facts particular to the occupant of the house suggesting that he was a burglar, rather than a resident. And they made no…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. Espinoza, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 2024
- (HC) Popke v. AndesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Murchison v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.