In re Citigroup Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CITIGROUP SECURITIES 20 Civ. 09132 (LAP) LITIGATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 motion for leave to amend 0F the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (“CAC”),2 (the F “Motion”).3 Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup” or “Citi”) and three 2F Citigroup officers (the “Officer Defendants”),4 (together 3F “Defendants”), oppose the motion on grounds of futility and undue delay.5 For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is 4F DENIED. 1 Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.