Legal Opinion
United States v. Bloom
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 19, 1977No. Crim. No. 77-383PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Defendants Burton Dubbin, Michael Rekoon, Bernard Cronin, Robert Street and Joseph DeLoge have all attacked this indictment on the ground that it is time-barred.1 A number of different arguments have been raised, which will be dealt with below. After consideration of these motions, the Court has decided to deny them.
A motion to dismiss the indictment, under Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2), attacks the indictment on its face and is not a device for a summary trial of the evidence. “It is directed only to the question of the validity of…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- United States v. KonefalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.