Legal Opinion

In Re Farmington Teachers Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 3, 2009No. 2007-779PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

In this petition for a writ of certiorari, the Farmington Teachers Association, NEA-New Hampshire (petitioner), seeks review of a ruling of the Board of Trustees (board) of the respondent New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS) that certain payments made to eight retired public school teachers by the Farmington School District (school district) were not “earnable compensation” for purposes of calculating retirement benefits. We affirm.

I

The facts are not in dispute. Between 1996 and 2005, the petitioner, which represents the eight teachers, entered into a series of collective bargaining…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Milette v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Bennett v. Town of HampsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. In re BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. McDonald v. Town of Effingham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. In Re GoodlanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  3. In re PoulicakosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. In Re State Employees'ass'n of NhSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. Appeal of Jean-Guy's Used Cars & Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API