State v. Woolbert

¶ 1. Defendant appeals an order of the trial court that he engaged in “violent or threatening behavior” contrary to his conditions of probation. Additionally, defendant argues that the trial court did not have the authority to modify both the “to serve” portion of defendant’s sentence and the conditions of his probation. We affirm.

¶ 2. In 2004, defendant pleaded guilty to sexual assault on a' minor and was sentenced to serve eight to twelve years with all but fourteen months of the sentence suspended. As part of his sentence, defendant was placed on probation, which applied while he was…