Diatz v. Washington Technical School, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellee has moved for a rehearing. His principal point is based on the contention that when he abandoned the premises and appellants took possession and relet, the privity of estate existing between them and him was terminated, and that without privity of estate there was no ■obligation on his part to pay rent. For this contention he relies on Lincoln Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Greusel, 199 Wis. 428, 224 N.W. 98, opinion adhered to, 199 Wis. 437, 227 N.W. 6, 70 A.L.R. 1096. That authority lends support to appellee’s contention, but in our opinion it is contrary to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Underhill v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Kottler v. New York Bargain House, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- McLaughlin v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Tyler Commercial College v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Lincoln Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. GreuselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Amberger & Wohlfarth, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- McIntosh v. GitomerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Truitt v. Evangel Temple, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Thomas D. Walsh, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.