Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Gitomer

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1956No. 1723PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

For convenience the parties hereto will be referred to as landlord and tenants. The landlord leased to the tenants a business property for a period of four years and seven months, beginning June 1, 1952, at a reptal payable in monthly instalments of $85. The landlord sued for rent for the period beginning September 1, 1953, and ending February 28, 1955. The trial court allowed full recovery and the tenants have appealed.

At trial it was shown that on March 2, 1954 the landlord by legal process had evicted the tenants for nonpayment of rent, and the controversy here…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hermitage Co. v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. International Trust Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Sobel v. DiatzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Friedman v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Diatz v. Washington Technical School, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. Ljc Corporation v. John J. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ostrow v. SmulkinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API