Legal Opinion
Amberger & Wohlfarth, Inc. v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1973No. 6516PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Associate Judge:
This action for the possession of leased real property was initiated in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Civil Division of the Superior Court. Following preliminary matters not here relevant, the date set for trial arrived. Prior to the introduction of any evidence, the District of Columbia, which effectively is appellant’s landlord, orally moved for a judgment on the pleadings. Following argument thereon, the trial court took the matter under advisement. The motion thereafter was granted. We reverse, and remand the case for trial.
The absence of an evidentiary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Sobel v. DiatzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Diatz v. Washington Technical School, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Kresge v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Interdonato v. InterdonatoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- McNeal v. HabibDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Landow v. Georgetown-Inland West Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.