Carlton v. Newton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above),
The question arising is the simple one of whether or not in the circumstances the appellee W. R. Newton can be deprived of the privilege of being sued in the county where he resides or the land lies. The statute expressly declares, and makes it the fundamental right of the defendant, that the venue of the action shall be at the residence of the party sued, unless there is some statutory provision to the contrary. Exceptions 12 and 14 of article 1995, enumerated in the statute governing venue, restrict the venue to the location of the land where the aim of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Skipwith v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Cobb v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Behrens Drug Co. v. Hamilton & McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MangumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Umberson v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Carlton v. Houston Agricultural Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Bennett v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Bennett v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1962