Legal Opinion

Tackett v. City of Huntington Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1994No. G013027PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

section 473, requiring a trial court to vacate a default, default judgment, or dismissal if the aggrieved party’s attorney submits a timely application for relief “in proper form, . . . accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect,” apply to a motion under Government Code section 946.6 for relief from the claim-filing requirement under the Government Tort Claims Act? No. Alternatively, did the superior court abuse its discretion in concluding the petitioning party failed to show excusable neglect that would warrant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bettencourt v. Los Rios Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Billings v. Health Plan of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Ayala v. Southwest Leasing & Rental, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Department of Water & Power v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. San Bernardino Community Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Berk v. Aurora Loan Services CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API