Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 18, 1982No. 39,604; NCM 79 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Judge:

Before the United States Navy Court of Military Review, appellant1 pointed out, as an assignment of error, that the certified record of trial contained the following erroneous instruction by the military judge:

Gentlemen, counsel will now present arguments on the sentence. I want to caution you that arguments do constitute evidence in this in this [sic] case. They are presented in an effort to assist you in determining a fair, just and appropriate sentence in this case.

This obvious instructional error was previously authenticated by the military judge *196and not commented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. NapierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. WilkersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GriffithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. DiamondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. BryantU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API