Legal Opinion

United States v. Griffith

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 28, 1988No. 57,660; ACM S27304PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*43OPINION OF THE COURT

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial with officer members on a charge that he wrongfully used lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on or about January 19, 1986, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 45 days, and reduction to airman basic. The convening authority approved the sentence; and the Court of Military Review affirmed (Senior Judge Sessoms dissented, concluding that the findings of fact were…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. RuppelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. ScaffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. DemerseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. BrothersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API