Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Oregon Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

— The plaintiff brought this action before a justice of the peace, under section 2611 of the Revised Statutes of 1889, tp recpver dpuble damages for the killing of a cow by the defendant’s cars. The plaintiff recovéred before the justice, and also in the circuit *10court, and the defendant, by successive appeals, has brought the case here for review.

The cause was submitted to the jury on the following ’ instruction asked by the plaintiff, of which the defendant complains: “Gentlemen of the jury: If you believe from the evidence that the defendant, the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Otto v. BentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Walter v. CathcartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. Pasley v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Chouteau v. UhrigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cross v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Daniel v. AtkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API