Legal Opinion

Walter v. Cathcart

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, Judge

This was a proceeding in forcible entry and detainer, taken to the Circuit Court by certiorari. None of the evidence given on the part of the plaintiff, Walter, is preserved in the record. The only piece of evidence offered by the defendant was an assignment of some leasehold premises to him by Gr. A. Phegley, showing a title to the tenements about which the suit was brought. This was excluded, to which an exception was taken. The record presents nothing else but the instructions given and refused. The judgment of the law is, that the proceedings below are correct, unless it be shown that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Welsh v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Vaughan v. Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API