Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Atkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1896Published

Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion

*344ON MOTION NOB EEHEAEING.

Rombauer, P. J.

The appellant labors under the impression that, owing to the trivial amount involved, his appeal has not been fully considered. This is a mistake. The record was examined by each of the judges seriatim, but is so imperfect in its recitals that it is difficult to ascertain what was tried and decided by the trial court. As two members of the court were of opinion that the objection to the jurisdiction of the trial court, on which the plaintiff mainly relied for reversal, is not well taken, we preferred to place our decision on a ground which all the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Porter v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Cameron v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Goodwin v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API