Legal Opinion

Hannon Law Firm, LLC v. Melat, Pressman & Higbie, LLP

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2011No. 009CA0788PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

In this action between attorneys, we must address whether, when multiple separate law firms represent clients under a contingent fee agreement, a withdrawing attorney's claim in quantum meruit against former co-counsel accrues at the time of the withdrawal or at the time that recovery under the contingent fee agreement occurs. We conclude that the claim cannot begin to acerue until the withdrawing attorney knows or should know of the recovery. We therefore reverse the trial court's judgment on the pleadings against plaintiff, The Hannon Law Firm (Hannon), and in favor…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Melat, Pressman & Higbie, L.L.P. v. Hannon Law Firm, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. Michael Bregman v. Steven PerlesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Sterenbuch v. GossColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Barnett v. Surefire Med., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  5. Andres Trucking Co. v. United Fire and Casualty CoColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API