Gillispie v. State

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in separate counts with the possession- of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale and of the unlawful transportation of such liquor.

Prom the bill of exceptions, it appears that preliminary to the trial, appellant, by motion duly presented, requested that he be furnished a copy of the indictment against him. This was refused on the theory that by his failure to demand it earlier, the appellant had waived his right to such copy. It is true that the right to make such demand may be waived either expressly or by conduct of the accused. Barrett v.…