Carpenter v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
K. MaxKOONCE, II, Judge.
In this case, we are asked to . review the probate judge’s interpretation of the will of Eunice Carpenter, deceased. The judge found that the will unambiguously devised the residue of the decedent’s estate to five particular individuals. Appellant C.J. Carpenter, a co-executor of the decedent’s estate, argues that the judge erred in determining that no ambiguity existed. We affirm.
Eunice Carpenter died in 1999 leaving an estate valued at approximately $361,000. Her husband, Hubert Carpenter, predeceased her. In her will, decedent devised virtually all of her property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adkinson v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Chlanda v. Estate of FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Crittenden v. LytleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Burnett v. First Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Estate of Harp v. HarpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metzgar v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Zilles v. American LegionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Harrison v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- In Re Estate of ZillesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Stogsdill v. StogsdillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.